Five things Congress could do for music creators that wouldn’t cost taxpayers a dime.
Originally posted by Chris Castle on The Hill's Congress Blog
Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, is holding hearings on an overhaul of the Copyright Act. Goodlatte is getting a lot of advice requiring considerable bureaucratic resources. It would be a missed opportunity to focus on the complex and not see the relatively simple reforms to better the lot of creators. Here’s a few ideas that not only could be quickly implemented but also could make a big difference in the lives of music artists and songwriters.
1. Create an Audit Right for Songwriters for Compulsory Licenses: One of the oldest compulsory licenses in the Copyright Act is the “mechanical license”, the statutory mandate forcing songwriters to license songs that dates from 1909. The government mandates the license and also mandates the rate that songwriters are paid—from 1909 until 1977 that rate was set at 2¢ per recording. Although that rate was eventually indexed to inflation leading to the current 9.1¢ minimum, songwriters had to dig out of a deep hole.
Getting paid is another story. This statutory license requires songwriters be sent “statements of account” for royalties—but songwriters are not allowed to conduct a “royalty compliance” examination (called an “audit”). The law requires a company officer and a CPA to certify the company’s statements—a practice rarely complied with. As recently demonstrated by Aimee Mann’s lawsuit against Medianet, if songwriters don’t get paid there’s not much they can do except sue—a costly process.
The government tells the songwriter “trust—but don’t verify.” This is an easy fix. Congress could give songwriters an audit right as they did for stakeholders in the contemporary digital performance compulsory license for satellite radio and Internet radio.
2. Allow Artists and Songwriters to Opt Out of the Compulsory License: The recent blow-up regarding the so-called “Internet Radio Fairness Act” and the related ASCAP and BMI rate court proceedings should let the Congress know that there are many artists and songwriters who want to be able to decide who gets to license their songs. Again, the digital performance compulsory license allows copyright owners to control “interactive” uses of their works—why not at least do the same for the mechanical license as well?
3. Federalize pre-72 Sound Recordings for Digital Royalties: Sound recordings did not receive federal copyright protection until 1972. When the Congress established the digital performance royalty, it seemed to clearly apply to all recordings and did not arbitrarily exclude recordings prior to 1972. However, this “gotcha” is used by SiriusXM and others to avoid paying great American artists whose records were released before 1972—jazz, R&B and rock legends get nothing. Congress could fix this “gotcha” and secure a fair share of digital performance royalties to these authors of our musical heritage.
4. Require All Unpaid Statutory Mechanical Royalties Be Paid to the State Unclaimed Property Offices: As Aimee Mann’s alleged in her lawsuit against the white label provider Medianet, witnesses stated that 23 percent of the songs used by Medianet are unlicensed—which could easily be millions of songs if true. And there are likely a number of digital music services that are arbitrarily holding unpaid royalties in an unauthorized “escrow.”
It seems that there could be substantial royalties controlled by the very retailers who must pay songwriters under the law, a potentially significant moral hazard. Congress could require that any “escrowed” royalties be paid over under State unclaimed property laws—a lawful “escrow.”
5. Require that Online and Offline Videos Follow the Same Rules: As online video platforms become available through Internet enabled home televisions, attention should be paid to a frequently overlooked category of songwriter—the film and television music composers. Current reporting by online video platforms makes it difficult for score composers to be paid for their work. The Congress may well ask whether those who seek to replace television should be held to the same licensing standards as television.
These are but a few ideas the Congress could be addressing that might make a difference in the lives of artists and songwriters and would cost the taxpayer very little. All leverage existing structures and bureaucracies, eliminate “gotchas,” and help to reduce the unintended consequences of government mandated compulsory licensing.
Castle is managing partner of Christian L. Castle, Attorneys.
Originally posted on 7/22/13 by Digital Music News written by Paul Resnikoff
When Chris Anderson first came out with the theory of the Long Tail, Google then-CEO Eric Schmidt was one of its most ardent supporters and devotees.
Fast-forward to 2013 just a few years, and the Long Tail was already been seriously undermined by Schmidt himself. Indeed, Schmidt now feels the actual reality of the internet is the complete opposite. In other words, bigger blockbusters than ever before, and smaller, less important niches than we could have ever imagined. Here's what Schmidt, now Google executive chairman, told the McKinsley Quarterly Review when asked about blockbusters, tails, and the future of niche media as early as 2008*.
I would like to tell you that the internet has created such a level playing field that the Long Tail is absolutely the place to be —
that there's so much differentiation, there's so much diversity, so many new voices. Unfortunately, that's not the case. What really happens is something called a power law, with the property that a small number of things are very highly concentrated and most other things have relatively little volume. Virtually all of the new network markets follow this law."
"So, while the tail is very
interesting, the vast majority of revenue remains in the head. And this is a
lesson that businesses have to learn. While you can have a Long Tail strategy,
you better have a head, because that's where all the revenue is."
And, in fact, it's probable that the internet will lead to larger blockbusters and more concentration of brands. Which,
again, doesn't make sense to most people, because it’s a larger distribution medium.
It's no longer a US superstar, it's a global superstar. So that means global
brands, global businesses, global sports figures, global celebrities, global scandals, global politicians.
So, we love the Long Tail, but we make most of our revenue in the head, because of the math of the power law. And you need both, by the way. You need the head and the tail to make the model work.
*In the original publication of this article, we mistakenly thought the comments were made in 2013, not 2008.
The purpose of the CREATE.Digital Blog is to provide an interactive knowledgebase & promotional platform focused on quality not quantity.
Contributors to the CREATE.Digital Music Blog will include internal staff & a variety of professional, qualified, opinionated, diverse, & experienced guests.
All the contents of the CREATE.Digital Blog, except for comments, constitute personal opinions. Blog content may contain inaccuracies or errors, and discretion should be exercised in the use information obtained from the blog. Blog content is provided for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for advice from qualified professionals. All blog content comes without warranties, representations, or guarantees of any kind. You agree that any use you make of blog content is at your own risk. You also agree that CREATE.Digital Music is not responsible for any losses resulting from your reliance on any blog content. We also reserve the right to revise any and all content on the blog at any time.
If you report offensive or inappropriate comments to CREATE.Digital Music, We will generally investigate and remove comments if required.
All blog content, including all information, text, graphics, photos, images, logos, and site design, is our intellectual property, and is protected by copyright and applicable intellectual property law.